Magnificent Duo


When we first glimpse the Coen Brothers’ version of Rooster Cogburn, he’s bathed in mote-filtered sunlight, a foul-tempered character from a western book of Judges dispensing the pitiless vengeance of an unforgiving god. In fact, the King James Bible and Shakespeare are ever present throughout the magnificent True Grit, the characters speaking in a tongue so rigorous it does not allow the use of contractions.

Why the Brothers’ latest offering is routinely being ranked below the facebook movie and swan thing in year-end roundups is just another reason such lists are so tedious. The Coens have proven from the outset their understanding of the American West, one every bit as profound as John Ford’s. In Jeff Bridges, they’ve found a John Wayne with equal presence and greater range; his work here is subtly different from his Oscar life time achievement award last year, and it’s miles, if not a light year, from the Dude in Big Lebowski or the jerk in Fisher King, one of his breakouts. Miles are plenty far. You want Bridges to be Bridges, a man who you pray will never take that final step between him and self-awareness. Sure, it will make him a better person, but it will kill the unapologetic rogue factor that makes him so appealing.

Of course, the Coens cast brilliantly most of the time, and have figured out how to spin previously pretty faces like George Clooney and Brad Pitt into comic gold (in O Brother, Where Art Thou and the otherwise ugly Burn After Reading, respectively). So it’s no surprise that the movie’s ensemble is thrilling to watch, as they handle language as carefully crafted as anything Mamet ever wrote, but less self-conscious and more mellifluous. “Braggadoccio,” “harpy,” “recollect”: the syllables are a pleasure to listen to, but only if the actors believe that their characters would naturally talk this way.

The tone for that belief is set by the uncanny Hailie Steinfield as Mattie. Somehow, this extraordinarily self-composed child (13 at the time of filmmaking) manages to give one of the performances of the year, maybe the decade. Onscreen, she conjures up in her first sentence a child raised, Lincoln-like, crouched over the book of Proverbs, the pages grimed by the smoke of a single candle. Her brown, unblinking eyes display an unnerving calm, her spine resolute, infused with self-righteous steel. She immediately signals that this is a story of another place, time, and reality. You desperately hope that she continues to work in movies with scripts this beautifully written.

I fear that the brilliant DP Roger Deakins will lose the cinematography Oscar yet again, likely to Libatique for the bird movie or Harris Savides, whose work on Social Network is undoubtedly innovative and beautiful. Deakins is such a master, so legendary that his body of work should be all the monument needed, but symbols are important, and I would guess that an award for a particular picture means more than one of those catch-all lifetime achievement statues. The guy can shoot basically anything perfectly, but seems to have a particular affinity for desolate landscapes, whether they’re the broad expanses west of the Mississippi, the ravaged alleys of punk-era London (Sid and Nancy), or the devastated domestic environments of A Beautiful Mind or House of Sand and Fog.

But while Deakins has saved a few dull scripts by providing something ravishing to look at when the story’s not making any sense, that’s hardly the case here. The story’s simple, engaging, and told with bone-dry humor. The cast members, including Matt Damon, Barry Pepper, Josh Brolin, and an uncredited John Goodman and Lucas Haas, to name several, are game and elegant in the way only hard men can be. Nearly everyone can ride, Bridges and Steinfield (I’m tellin’ you, this kid is incredible) beautifully so, as important to a Western as, one presumes, the ability to dance should be to a ballet movie.

My one quibble is that the movie is overscored in certain places. In the crisis that precedes the climax, the movie turns melodramatic when the music starts telegraphing. In fact, that crisis scene could potentially derail the whole thing; suddenly, we’re in the middle of a shoot-’em-up of a bunch of characters we really don’t know enough to care about, and the whole thing’s a little swift and easy; it’s forgivable for showing that Mattie’s cold-blooded lust for “justice” has an ugly price, but it would work better and feel less predictable without all those blasted strings. And when Dolly Parton-soundalike Iris DeMent starts warbling “Leaning on the Everlasting Arms,” the spine of Carter Burwell’s score (lovely as long as it’s kept as austere as the photography), it diminishes the poetry of the last shot as Mattie, now all grown up but unbowed not a centimeter, walks purposefully away from five tombstones on an otherwise empty hill. In silence….what an ending.

But movies can never be perfect; like any work of creation, at some point you just have to stop tweaking and get the damn thing out so that people can see them. See True Grit. It’s an elegy to a kind of cinema and storytelling that doesn’t get made much any more. Thank God the Coens are so contrary.

Old Man, Young Tart

Time was when I saw pretty much everything, and when the Oscars came around I actually had opinions on what should win based on the movies. Well, I’ve long since learned that the Oscars are a big dumb joke, and that the things that win are usually sentimental payback (The Departed) or movies with really big casts (Crash, Return of the King, Gladiator). Think about it; all those people worked, and they all get to vote. Sort of a no-brainer. Meanwhile, prior to this weekend, the last time I managed to get excited enough about something to drag myself to the theater was when Dreamgirls opened.

But for some reason, this past week, I got some weird movie fever and became desperate to see all the Oscar nominees before the Oscars. Rather than try to make sense of this phenomenon, I just went with it. The spouse wasn’t interested, so I took myself to No Country for Old Men on Saturday, then went with the eldest to see all the animated short subjects that night and Juno yesterday.

I’m not a huge Coen brothers fan; I like some of their movies a lot, esp. O Brother and Miller’s Crossing, but I’m not jumping to see them like I would be for something by Michael Mann (let’s hope there are no sequels to Miami Vice). I also am not real fond of Cormac McCarthy; he’s a little too high-falutin’ for me, a little too anointed. So I basically only picked this one because it wasn’t as long as There Will Be Blood. Well, No Country is one helluva movie. It strikes me as light years beyond Fargo, which I always thought was a little forced/let’s-laugh-at-people-who-talk-funny. The acting is great, there are two of the most suspenseful scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie without a note of music, and honestly there’s not a bad frame in it. Tommy Lee Jones gives a knock-out performance, and provides extremely dry comic relief, which, on him, doesn’t come off oh-those-whimsical-Coens but is just funny. Javier Bardem is really really scary. Josh Brolin is charming. It’s got to be tough to pull off a morality tale (lesson: money is evil) with such a light touch and yet still deliver exactly the right density, but they do it. I’ll be glad when the spouse sees it, I do think it will be his cup of tea.

As for Juno, I didn’t think I’d like it, and …. was right. The writing is self-conscious and clever, and the whole thing exudes an Isn’t-Sundance-Wonderful? aura. Ellen Page is swell if you like 20-year-olds playing 16-year-olds with mouths full of 35-year-old Neil Simon witticisms (but updated with lots of dudes, shittys, and whatever else teenagers said last week). I fear she will probably win Best Actress. Sigh. Oh well, hopefully cooler heads will prevail and Julie Christie will get it, though that will be a pleasant surprise. Page is extremely talented, but the stuff she has to say is just too icky (it does get less cloying as the movie proceeds). Throughout Juno, I decided not to say anything in case Eldest was diggin’ it. When, 30 minutes in, she whispered, “This is awful, isn’t it?,” I sighed with relief. We decided to stay mainly because, as she put it, “Everybody’s talking about it, so we might as well say we gave it a fair shot.” There were a couple of sweet moments toward the end, but basically, it’s a movie that’s so in love with itself it’s a little shameless the way we’re all being asked to love it as well.

The shorts were very cool, and I’m glad I saw them. Peter and the Wolf was a real delight, but I have no idea how you pick something out of that batch, so I’d probably do a process of elimination if I had to vote on the best. Probably the thinnest are I Met the Walrus, which is inventive and a lot of fun but not particularly substantive, and even penguins go to heaven, which was very French and basically an extended joke. The Russian movie was gorgeous, done in this cool impressionistic/Chagall style and based on Turgenev. The most haunting in my book was Madame Tutli Putli, where an amazing Edith Piaf lookalike puppet takes this very creepy train ride. Neither Eldest nor I is quite sure what that one was about, but it definitely stuck with us.

So only Atonement and There Will Be Blood to go, as Michael Clayton, which hasn’t got a shot, is out on DVD this week. Reports later.